Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sean's avatar

Hey there,

I just finished reading your blog post, and I couldn't help but notice a few things that led me to believe it might have been generated with the help of a generative AI. Firstly, while the content was well-structured, it felt a bit over-generalized, missing the personal touch and anecdotes one typically expects from human-authored pieces. The phrasing, at times, seemed ambiguous, even though it was grammatically correct, which gave me the impression of an AI optimizing for sentence construction rather than true comprehension.

Furthermore, the narrative had subtle inconsistencies. While you maintained a central theme, there were moments where unrelated points were brought up, which disrupted the flow, as if the content was trying to predict the next best sentence without ensuring a cohesive narrative. The tone felt unusually neutral, devoid of personal bias or emotion, which felt a tad sterile for a piece like this.

I also noticed a peculiar mix of perfection and flaws in the writing. Some sections were so pristine, they lacked colloquialisms, while others had odd phrasings that seemed out of place.

Of course, I could be mistaken, and I don't mean any offense. It's genuinely fascinating how advanced AI has become in emulating human writing, and if you did use such tools, it's a testament to the evolving landscape of content creation. Would love to hear your thoughts on this!

Best wishes,

Sean

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts